<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Wordie: Cocksucker: Comments</title>
    <link>http://wordie.org/words/cocksucker</link>
    <description>Comments for the word 'Cocksucker'</description>
    <generator>http://wordie.org</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Comment by reesetee, 5 months ago</title>
      <link>http://wordie.org/words/cocksucker#comments</link>
      <description>;-)</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 00:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://wordie.org/words/cocksucker#comments</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comment by palooka, 5 months ago</title>
      <link>http://wordie.org/words/cocksucker#comments</link>
      <description>I agree reesetee - the second definition is way off target.  I've always found the term itself overly abrasive - it plain sucks.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 02:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://wordie.org/words/cocksucker#comments</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comment by reesetee, 5 months ago</title>
      <link>http://wordie.org/words/cocksucker#comments</link>
      <description>Umm...but the second definition? A little...broad, don't you think?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://wordie.org/words/cocksucker#comments</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comment by sarra, 5 months ago</title>
      <link>http://wordie.org/words/cocksucker#comments</link>
      <description>straight-faced from WordNet there.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 03:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://wordie.org/words/cocksucker#comments</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
