<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Wordie: Shoddy: Comments</title>
    <link>http://wordie.org/words/shoddy</link>
    <description>Comments for the word 'Shoddy'</description>
    <generator>http://wordie.org</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Comment by Prolagus, about 7 hours ago</title>
      <link>http://wordie.org/words/shoddy#comments</link>
      <description>Very interesting. The Weirdnet Paradox.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://wordie.org/words/shoddy#comments</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comment by yarb, about 7 hours ago</title>
      <link>http://wordie.org/words/shoddy#comments</link>
      <description>If "shoddy" is defined as "cheap and shoddy", then isn't "shoddy" actually "cheap and cheap and cheap and cheap and cheap and..." in an endless succession of "cheap"s? In fact, I believe shoddy would simply be "cheap" ad infinitum, never actually getting to the shoddy bit at all.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://wordie.org/words/shoddy#comments</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comment by Prolagus, about 8 hours ago</title>
      <link>http://wordie.org/words/shoddy#comments</link>
      <description>Can you call the first one a definition, you shoddy Weirdnet?!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 00:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://wordie.org/words/shoddy#comments</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
