Wordie: Cringeworthy corporate buzzwords: Comments

Comment by planspark, 3 months ago

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:54:39 +0000

Onboarding, anyone?

Comment by MissAnthropist, 4 months ago

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:49:30 +0000

Proper Product Placement, and Customer Will Call?

Comment by trivet, 6 months ago

Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:47:38 +0000

I humbly submit successories.

Comment by yarb, 6 months ago

Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:20:29 +0000

A brilliant and affecting analysis, thtownse.

Comment by thtownse, 6 months ago

Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:23:51 +0000

I love this list. All cringing aside, I think that coporate-speak is an interesting linguistic phenomenon. The way I see it, it reflects the all-encompassing desire for total efficiency in the corporate world. People see themselves as important contributors to an idealized state of a pure synthesis of razor-sharp accuracy and all-dominating competitiveness. They want to be this because as we all know, the dark side of the corporate ideal is that it is basically cold at heart - anyone who does not perform is ousted without fanfare and their name is not mentioned again. So the other driving force, and ultimately the strongest, is fear for one's own well-being.

In language, these things play out as the simultaneous desire to not appear abnormal and to achieve efficiency in words - to express complex ideas quickly in a way that others will immediately understand so as to eliminate the need for time-wasters like explanation. Those of us who appreciate the intricasies of language know that metaphor is a powerful way to 'leverage' a complex thought into a neat efficient package. So it is no wonder that the pressure-cooker world of Corporatia makes pervasive use of these memes.

To those of you lucky enough to not be embroiled in it, and to us who can see the humor from the inside, it is indeed quite funny and absurd. But take pity, you fortunate ones, for we who toil in cubes, who synergize in every one of multitudinous meetings, who smile and look the othe way as our lesser-endowed colleagues are winnowed from our midst by the bloody scythe - it is our lot to continue to think outside the box while all the while making thicker, higher, and more impenetrable its cold walls.

Comment by bagpussmonkey, 7 months ago

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:01:45 +0000

Let's take this offline

Comment by tagyoureit, 8 months ago

Thu, 07 Feb 2008 03:15:57 +0000

i cringed, gangerh. i can't believe those were actually used in a letter.

Comment by gangerh, 8 months ago

Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:17:39 +0000

Just reading a letter from a company to us about 2008 Update including these words -
brand-split,
time-poor.
Not too sure whether they are cringeworthy enough.

Comment by brusselsprouts, 8 months ago

Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:36:40 +0000

Within same context although not a buzzword "TLA" = three letter acroynms

Comment by gangerh, 8 months ago

Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:21:05 +0000

lift statement
elevator pitch

Comment by gangerh, 8 months ago

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:41:45 +0000

What an annoying list! ;-)
I think I should be able to shoe-horn it into my schedule somewhere.
Who else thinks 'cringeworthy' is onomatopoeic?

Comment by Minerva, 8 months ago

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 06:53:28 +0000

What about cluetrain? Or signage? (*shivers*)

Comment by Minerva, 8 months ago

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 06:52:27 +0000

This is such a wonderful list, and it is truly cringeworthy. Why, right now I'm huddled in a fetal position, rocking back and forth...

Comment by brusselsprouts, 8 months ago

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 06:14:18 +0000

Somewhat similar to lessons learned is "learnings"....as in..what are the learnings from this project? (which just lost huge sums of money)...

Comment by brusselsprouts, 8 months ago

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 06:12:01 +0000

We should focus on your "work life balance", typically followed by three new projects and two messes that you've been asked to clean up....

Let's do some back of the envelope calculations....

Let's "rif 'em"..because it'll take too long to work with HR and fire him.....(RIF = reduction in force)

Comment by Goatboy, 8 months ago

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 01:23:52 +0000

integrated solution
out of the loop
outsourcing

Comment by Goatboy, 8 months ago

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 01:20:51 +0000

networking
hit the ground running

Comment by gangerh, 8 months ago

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:59:45 +0000

how about having a
'light bulb moment'
?

Comment by tagyoureit, 8 months ago

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:49:03 +0000

counter-factual is classic

Comment by Treeseed, 8 months ago

Sun, 27 Jan 2008 12:02:18 +0000

Can do! or Can-do attitude

also "cubicle world"

also "ducks in a row" as in "I'll get my ducks in a row and get back with you later."

crunch some numbers

Comment by Misterpolly, 8 months ago

Sun, 27 Jan 2008 11:47:45 +0000

Great list! Added to my favourites. What about "downsizing"?

Comment by sionnach, 8 months ago

Sun, 27 Jan 2008 10:18:36 +0000

I think 80/20 is the Pareto Principle, yes.
Nowadays, there's the long tail to think about. And maybe the occasional black swan.

Comment by gangerh, 8 months ago

Sun, 27 Jan 2008 10:02:10 +0000

80/20 - isn't that the Pareter Principle?
A great list for the unincorporated (like me) to sneer and guffaw at.
How about 'counter-factual'. The best use I heard of this was "What I'm hearing here is actually counter-factual". Meaning,of course,"You're a liar".

Comment by brusselsprouts, 8 months ago

Sun, 27 Jan 2008 09:25:42 +0000

Oooh, this week I heard; Performant and Pre-planning.

Comment by tagyoureit, 10 months ago

Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:37:31 +0000

how is net net used, john? i don't think i've ever heard it.

Comment by John, 10 months ago

Sat, 17 Nov 2007 05:56:27 +0000

How about "net net" (or maybe it's net-net? or net/net?)

Comment by mollusque, 11 months ago

Sat, 03 Nov 2007 03:30:38 +0000

How about restructuring and "smooth transition".

Comment by virago, 11 months ago

Sat, 03 Nov 2007 02:37:20 +0000

We need to "escalate" this to the next level.

"80/20" - everybody says it, but I don't think anybody really knows what it means. From what I've read, it means having 80% of the functionality when the project is complete. However, most people use it for 80% accuracy, which is very different. And, who wants to be around when the 20% lack of accuracy impacts the CEO's mistress.

Comment by virago, 11 months ago

Sat, 03 Nov 2007 02:29:15 +0000

OK, one more (for now): "Customer Focus"

Comment by virago, 11 months ago

Sat, 03 Nov 2007 02:27:21 +0000

How about "opportunity?" It's what a manager says you have when they are giving you a task nobody wants to do.

We like to take a "SWAG." It is a Wild Ass Guess with a "Scientific" pretext.

Have you ever covered a project from "wing to wing?" And, then "repair in the air?" We don't have time to land this baby ya' know.

Prioritize, prioritize, prioritize.

Comment by palooka, 11 months ago

Sat, 03 Nov 2007 01:37:38 +0000

Our Department Heads spent the entire morning visioning.

Comment by sionnach, 11 months ago

Sat, 03 Nov 2007 00:15:19 +0000

parameter

Comment by skipvia, 11 months ago

Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:16:04 +0000

I bet if I work smarter, not harder, I could come up with a cringeworthy phrase...

Comment by reesetee, 11 months ago

Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:27:55 +0000

I'll bet a little part of you died inside, sionnach.

Comment by tagyoureit, 11 months ago

Fri, 02 Nov 2007 14:02:40 +0000

nice, sionnach.

Comment by sionnach, 11 months ago

Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:19:57 +0000

Well, this is one I didn't come across all that often, but the first time I encountered it, in a consultant's report, I had to go lie down for the rest of the afternoon to recover:

debottlenecking

Comment by trivet, 11 months ago

Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:34:52 +0000

Thank you, reesetee. *dabs eyes* This is why I eschew the corporate world with a firm hand and a big stick.

Comment by uselessness, 11 months ago

Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:53:28 +0000

Equestrian quartet. Brilliant. Favorited.

Comment by tagyoureit, 11 months ago

Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:46:14 +0000

i'm glad we have your buy-in

Comment by rocksinmypockets, 11 months ago

Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:05:32 +0000

At this point I have to favorite this list for both the list and the commentary. How does it get so bad?

Comment by reesetee, 11 months ago

Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:59:31 +0000

Sionnach, I think I could stand working with you. ;-)

*handing trivet some cotton gauze to dab her eyes*

Comment by sionnach, 11 months ago

Wed, 31 Oct 2007 03:14:43 +0000

I found this on my hard drive, from an April 1st quiz I gave to my employees a few years ago:

What is your explanation for:

the bizarre proliferation of the letters ‘X’ and ‘Z’ in drug names during the past decade? Estimate the annual incidence of adverse events attributable to the resulting confusion in writing and filling prescriptions.

the occurrence of which of the following morphemes in a drug name wants to make you rush right out there and get some?

lox lex lux lix lax lyx bud
loxxx lyxxx laaxx voxxx lyzzz luxylyx

Management potential

Write a single, syntactically correct, sentence of no more than 15 words, which uses each of the following words or phrases (extra points for any noun used as a verb). Note that the requirement is only that the syntax should be correct, not that it be meaningful

impact leverage bandwidth
parameter resources
infrastructure information
synergistic workflow

Strategic vision

Significant eschatological implications have been forecast in connection with the much-anticipated ‘second coming”, known to some as the “Rapture”. There’s the vexing “blood-dimmed tide” (accompanied by the sudden onset of avian deafness and generalized deterioration in animal posture in key regions of the middle east) foretold by that ol’ mystic Yeats. Or everybody’s favorite equestrian quartet, sketched so vividly in the account of John of Patnos. Not to mention the highway chaos that we can expect from the pileup of cars whose drivers are sucked up during the Rapture. Clearly, challenging times lie ahead.

Estimate the statistical problems that might accompany the end of the world. Construct an experiment that might be used to test your theory (at the 5% significance level)

Comment by tagyoureit, 11 months ago

Wed, 31 Oct 2007 02:14:24 +0000

aarrrggh! low-hanging fruit is the worst and i hear it all the time!

Comment by Jeff, 11 months ago

Wed, 31 Oct 2007 01:35:16 +0000

"Paint the picture" is is used quite often where I work.

Comment by trivet, 11 months ago

Wed, 31 Oct 2007 01:23:39 +0000

My eyes are bleeding.

Comment by chained_bear, 11 months ago

Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:30:50 +0000

Oh sionnach, that pained me. Pained me to the core. Here I am, at home in my comfy chair, and reading your list made me see my gray cubicle walls closing in around me, feel the fluorescent lights' effect on my sallow flesh, hear the hum of the copier just steps away, and the incessant chirruping of several phones.

Comment by arby, 11 months ago

Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:56:00 +0000

How about taking a WAG (Wild-Assed Guess)?

Comment by reesetee, 11 months ago

Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:53:29 +0000

Thank you, tagyoureit. That's what I was thinking when I saw bandwidth here.

Eesh.

Comment by sionnach, 11 months ago

Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:46:26 +0000

Some steps in the evolution of a "high performance team":

mandatory offsite for teambuilding exercises
brainstorming (which would include both thinking outside the box, and maybe a little blue-skying)
developing a mission statement and/or vision statement
setting a BHAG (big hairy-assed goal)
obtaining "stakeholder" "buyin"
acting as "change agents" ("paradigm shift" optional)
working "smarter not harder" (having identified the core competencies and picked the low-hanging fruit, leveraging synergies to take things to the next level)
blamestorming
lessons learned

Comment by arby, 11 months ago

Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:27:45 +0000

Yes, yes, yes! I hate corporate culture. Hate it! A lot of these involve the (completely unnecessary IMO) verbing of nouns. Here are some more I've heard:

level of comfort/comfort level
hot-button
implementation
all-hands
solution
processes
integration
speed to market
exposure items
circle around
off-line
tag team

Comment by uselessness, 11 months ago

Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:24:49 +0000

Oooh. Okay. I cringed.

Comment by tagyoureit, 11 months ago

Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:17:18 +0000

i agree, until someone uses it to describe their workload: "i have so many presentations this week, i just don't have the bandwidth for this project right now." *that's* when it's cringeworthy.

Comment by uselessness, 11 months ago

Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:54:56 +0000

As an official Web Guy, I have to say that bandwidth is a perfectly legitimate technical term. I do agree with the other two you suggested, though.

Comment by sionnach, 11 months ago

Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:38:33 +0000

How about "team player", "bandwidth", "best of brand"?

Comment by reesetee, 11 months ago

Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:18:23 +0000

This is so painful. *wincing*

Comment by tagyoureit, 11 months ago

Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:56:10 +0000

yes. see what happens when we all leverage our synergies?

Comment by skipvia, 11 months ago

Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:55:33 +0000

Here's one I really hate: "going forward," as in "We'll have to develop a new strategy going forward."

Comment by John, 11 months ago

Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:37:59 +0000

Does "best practices" fit? And there's the much-reviled "outside the box."

Comment by tagyoureit, 11 months ago

Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:07:08 +0000

oooh good ones. glad to have you onboard.

Comment by rocksinmypockets, 11 months ago

Tue, 30 Oct 2007 18:34:46 +0000

How about offshoring, communicate out, core competency, and ramp up?

Comment by rocksinmypockets, 11 months ago

Tue, 30 Oct 2007 05:45:17 +0000

This is a great list. I am an artist and teacher, and sometimes I swear my partner speaks a completely different language. She works in Corporate America (as she calls it).