euripidean
has been listed 2 times with 0 comments
conradian
has been listed 1 time with 0 comments
woolfian
has been listed 1 time with 0 comments
nabokovian
has been listed 3 times with 0 comments
wellesian
has been listed 2 times with 0 comments
vertovian
has been listed 1 time with 0 comments
coppolian
has been listed 1 time with 0 comments
malickean
has been listed 1 time with 0 comments
godardian
has been listed 1 time with 0 comments
buñuelian
has been listed 1 time with 0 comments
kantian
has been listed 6 times with 0 comments
lockean
has been listed 3 times with 0 comments
miltonic
has been listed 2 times with 0 comments
orwellian
has been listed 22 times with 0 comments
emersonian
has been listed 2 times with 0 comments
beckettian
has been listed 2 times with 0 comments
asimovian
has been listed 1 time with 0 comments
marlovian
has been listed 2 times with 1 comment
shavian
has been listed 6 times with 0 comments
byronic
has been listed 10 times with 0 comments
wagnerian
has been listed 7 times with 0 comments
kafkaesque
has been listed 29 times with 5 comments
tolstoian
has been listed 1 time with 0 comments
lucretian
has been listed 2 times with 0 comments
dickensian
has been listed 13 times with 0 comments
joycean
has been listed 4 times with 0 comments
wildean
has been listed 1 time with 0 comments
socratic
has been listed 19 times with 0 comments
platonic
has been listed 29 times with 0 comments
Then there are the adjectives formed from first names, or which relate to people known primarily by their first name:
Mosaic (Mosaic law)
Pauline (the Pauline epistles)
Petrine (the Petrine era in Russia)
Johannine (the Johannine doctrine of the Logos)
Elizabethan
Victorian
Jacobean
and many more.
As for last name derivations:
Dostoevskian, Pushkinian, etc.
A curious one is: Hugolian, from Victor Hugo. Also, I like what happens to Foucault: Foucauldian.
I just listed 'phildickian' for Phil K. Dick, if you want to add it. Great list, by the way. I started one of my own before I found yours. I'm going to delete mine.
I'm taking cues from the website I posted below and wikipedia's list of eponymous adjectives.
The article posted mentions a certain "Literary League's Language Label Committee," which apparently makes authoritative decisions on the forms used for the adjectives, but I can't seem to find any more info about it.
I do like the alternative adjectivizations of names though.
So why is it Byronic, but not Pynchonic? And shouldn't that be woolfish? :)
I've definitely seen runyonesque in print.
personally, I would have gone with Tolstovian.
Then there is the vexing case of Fabian, which could be an adjective related to a certain procrastinating Roman general, or a noun representing a certain former teen idol, for whom the relevant adjective would presumably have to be Fabianesque.
Just saying...
Oh, I think you forgot uselessnessian.
I thought you were implying it was a useless list because it can be done to any personage. I think marlovian is my favorite of the ones I've entered.
Eh? No - no dig intended by me!
Is that a dig at my list? : ) Nevertheless, I was looking for standard forms found in credible sources. You know, like websites.
Inspired by this nugget
Beckettian? You can do this for almost any noted personage.