chad
has been listed 9 times with 18 comments
truck nutz
has been listed 5 times with 24 comments
binoculars
has been listed 7 times with 17 comments
nonpareil
has been listed 41 times with 17 comments
spelt
has been listed 7 times with 22 comments
gormless
has been listed 52 times with 20 comments
drummer
has been listed 2 times with 8 comments
okra
has been listed 10 times with 13 comments
pouze
has been listed 2 times with 17 comments
listmaster
has been listed 2 times with 19 comments
cheerful
has been listed 5 times with 20 comments
peeler
has been listed 7 times with 18 comments
powder
has been listed 11 times with 21 comments
church key
has been listed 4 times with 12 comments
ravishing
has been listed 19 times with 15 comments
aurify
has been listed 4 times with 11 comments
commenty
has been listed 4 times with 18 comments
chaordic
has been listed 14 times with 15 comments
y'all
has been listed 12 times with 22 comments
buffalo
has been listed 12 times with 11 comments
negligence
has been listed 2 times with 13 comments
englishe
has been listed 1 time with 10 comments
meme
has been listed 77 times with 12 comments
eddress
has been listed 4 times with 10 comments
crocs
has been listed 3 times with 13 comments
marquee
has been listed 10 times with 14 comments
stinkhead
has been listed 5 times with 17 comments
verbing
has been listed 5 times with 15 comments
baromets
has been listed 3 times with 11 comments
myrrh
has been listed 41 times with 16 comments
hoodoo
has been listed 20 times with 13 comments
pareidolia
has been listed 28 times with 8 comments
9:22pm
John; we need a tutorial on html. Do ya think?
Yep, I think I'm doing everything to make my code as non-wonky as possible. I'm just using the code for hyperlinks that u sent me awhile ago.
But John, no worries. If this means that I "need" to put each hyperlink it its own box, then that'll put me ahead of even slumry in citations for the week. Mwa-ha-ha-ha-ha
dang. maybe it's not fixed :-|
Should be fixed -- rather than give the parsing error, the code now just strips all html if it thinks it's wonky.
How to write non-wonky html? Make sure it's xml/xhtml compliant. Some tips:
- Close all your tags. So rather than using just a <p> tag to create a paragraph, wrap the whole paragraph with beginning and ending tags, <p>like this</p>.
- If you use stand-alone tags, make them self-closing. It's <br />, not <br>. That goes for images tags, too: <img src="foo" />
- Use lowercase characters in tags. It's <p>, not <P>.
- Quote all tag attributes. It's <a href="http://wordie.org">, not <a href=http://wordie.org>.
Hope that helps.
The problem is that I can't see any of the text. Instead, I get the new parsing error message. I pressed enter a couple of times and even added some text between the links. Both links worked when I copied them into independent locations. Any ideas?
There are plenty of list descriptions with multiple links in them... you must be doing something wrong. Do you get an error message, or does the code just not work right? Are you putting both links back-to-back on the same line, or pressing Enter between each one?
In making my conversations list, I became frustrated because I couldn't include conversations on lists. (Like the one forming here.) I was going to make a list in the list description, but when you put in two links, Wordie gives you an error message. I don't want to make one comment per link, but I don't see any other way. :-/
Wait wait, what are you trying to do here? I'm confused.
Ok. Both the link to John's profile and U's wordie guidelines are correct. Why can't I put two links in the same box?
Word Guidelines for Wordie