morf has been listed 1 time with 1 comment
slerm has been listed 1 time with 1 comment
protusilation has been listed 1 time with 1 comment
up-hites has been listed 1 time with 1 comment
fumetti has been listed 1 time with 2 comments
oralology has been listed 1 time with 1 comment
reverbatrons has been listed 1 time with 1 comment
grawlixes has been listed 1 time with 1 comment
teteology has been listed 2 times with 1 comment
boozex has been listed 2 times with 2 comments
staggeration has been listed 2 times with 1 comment
doozex has been listed 2 times with 1 comment
farkles has been listed 1 time with 4 comments
indotherm has been listed 2 times with 1 comment
maledicta balloon has been listed 5 times with 8 comments
digitrons has been listed 1 time with 0 comments
nittles has been listed 3 times with 2 comments
quimp has been listed 6 times with 3 comments
jarns has been listed 3 times with 3 comments
crottles has been listed 1 time with 1 comment
oculama has been listed 2 times with 5 comments
spurls has been listed 1 time with 1 comment
that-a-tron has been listed 2 times with 0 comments
sphericasia has been listed 3 times with 1 comment
whiteope has been listed 1 time with 3 comments
vites has been listed 1 time with 1 comment
solrads has been listed 2 times with 1 comment
dites has been listed 1 time with 1 comment
lucaflect has been listed 4 times with 1 comment
swalloops has been listed 1 time with 1 comment
blurgits has been listed 2 times with 1 comment
waftaroms has been listed 1 time with 3 comments
emanata has been listed 7 times with 2 comments
plewds has been listed 2 times with 1 comment
squeans has been listed 3 times with 3 comments
briffits has been listed 1 time with 1 comment
hites has been listed 1 time with 1 comment
agitrons has been listed 1 time with 1 comment
You may want to move this discussion to bugs so that other people can easily access it. :-)
sionnich: I find the same thing happens - if I edit a post in which I've previously entered a (correctly) formatted link, and the edit has nothing to do with the link, it first appears that the link has vanished. However, it generally reappears upon refreshing my browser. (I think this is what you meant, yes?)
Yes, exactly. In fact, the link which gave me problems and resulted in the question - Drinky Crow - is now back on line, on its own. In selected cases, I may start adding the URL right beside the link to be be doubly certain. If you see this odd configuration, you'll know why.
yaybob: I find the same thing happens - if I edit a post in which I've previously entered a (correctly) formatted link, and the edit has nothing to do with the link, it first appears that the link has vanished. However, it generally reappears upon refreshing my browser. (I think this is what you meant, yes?)
Thanks for your suggestions on the denizen list, and others.
In case it never appears in the post below this one, this is the URL for the Drinky Crow YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FiNGpCHSE8
I've been having a terrible time getting the links in my posts operational or to stay operational, even when the formatting appears perfect. Furthermore, sometimes a link will just disappear after editing a remote part of the post, and upon reloading, reappear. Poltergeists! Is anybody else having a similar problem, or is this something more local, like my computer or server?
Wonderful list and a wonderful subject. I just stumbled onto this material recently, and have dug into the subject a little. Information available on the Internet is sparse and sometimes contradictory. I'm concerned about my definition of crottles not agreeing with yours, and unfortunately, I haven't been able to retrace my steps and find it again to see if I made an error copying it.
Michael Quinion discusses the subject. Crottles appears on his list as crottle-eyed. BTW, if you're interested, his list contains several terms not on your list, although he doesn't define any of them: neoflect, spurl, direct-a-tron (and throwatron, staggeratron, sailatron, swishatron), and jigg.
The definition that I found for crottles - the Xes drawn for the eyes of a dead or stuporous character - conflicts with the Wordie definition. Also, you (reesetee) defined oculama as, "The cartoon science of creating eyes." To that, MiaLuthien added, "Also, Xs over a character's eyes to indicate drunkenness or death," so, there's some ambiguity already.
As I indicated, I don't recall where I got the definition of crottles that I provided, but Quinion's use of the term "crottle-eyed" lends some support to the idea that my resource might have been correct. Although Google provides several mentions of Mort Walker, his book on the subject, and lists of many of his cartooning neologisms, even with an earnest effort, I wasn't able to find definitions of these words anywhere except wherever it was that I read that definition of crottles, and from Wikipedia. And this article contained only a handful of definitions, crottles not being among them. So I can't resolve the issue.
Apparently, this is proprietary material, and they want us to buy the book (pictured on the Wiki page). And since you have provided quite a few more definitions as well as provided a citation from Walker, I'm guessing that you bought the book and can sort this out.
If you are into this stuff enough to have bought a book on it, then you might be interested to know that the Cartoon Channel just introduced a new cartoon to its Adult Swim lineup called Drinky Crow. I've seen it just once, and loved it for both the story line of that single episode as well as the animation. Drinky is often depicted with Xes for eyes, as in the YouTube sample here.
Well put, sionnach! I love the fact that Walker meant them to be spoofs and they ended up being actual definitions. :-)
*Wondering what the idea was*
Isn't this every wordie's dream, when you get right down to it? To smuggle a whole slew of one's very own madeupical words into the language, and get away with it.
Just wait and see.
Thanks! *wondering what the idea is*
Great list! And chained_bear is giving me an idea...
I want to hang out in a workplace where all these words are used regularly. Wouldn't that rock...