Palooka, when it comes to genitals, it's very important never to flinch. You could mess something up pretty badly, particularly when you're talking about somebody else's.
I often mock-full after boring dinner parties so I can get home and eat something that's actually palatable, made by a person who has a clue as to how to feed people (that would be me!).
I mock-clueless a lot, too. You can learn quite a bit about people that way, I've discovered (and it's kinda fun!).
Here's my take on the feelings about agynary, for what it's worth:
c_b, you are hysterical (no pun intended) and accurate.
gangerh, you are passionate.
reesetee, you are easy-going and a little squeamish (and I love it).
palooka, you are a peace-maker (and your name makes me think of bubble gum)
whichbe, you are prolific (in general)
pro, you are missed...
Not authorized? I thought I was authorized to speak for all the males on Wordie, Prolagus. I'm sort of like a Wordie Advocate General for Male Affairs. Let's beat our chests (not our breasts) & declare our male sense of dignity.
Slight correction, chained_bear. They don't partly belong to someone else, even privately partly. They wholly belong to to both of us. When you belong to each other, you don't exclude certain parts. And do two genital rights make a genital wrong?
Well, this bear is glad she's married to someone else then. I think it would be mighty weird to have to say my genitals belong partly to someone else. They're mine, dammit. If I want to grant access, that's one thing, but they don't belong to anyone but me.
*standing up for genital rights*
Slight correction, chained_bear. They belong to both of us. And access is not always guaranteed!
And thanks for the comment - you did not disappoint.:-)
And not sure about the suit idea. Wouldn't work for me, anyway, all mine are single-breasted.
Palooka: Yes, I know. The idea was that the word's definition implies an incompleteness. Since men do not have female genitals, I was implying that they are incomplete. It's really much less funny when I have to explain it.
Your first comment doesn't quite make sense c_b. The definition is "lacking female genitals". Men don't have female genitals. Hopefully we wont have to link to photos to illustrate the difference.
She will probably be most interested to find out that her genitals actually belong to you. When you say you've got some at home, do you mean you have access to some at home? Or do you mean, you know, you have ... some kind of ... suit at home, that you can put on...?
Wow. That kind of gets at my point in a really clear way. *thinks about enrolling in a school for making propaganda posters*
c_b, you may like this one.
(Disclaimer: by clicking on this link you are accepting to read atheist satirical material).
Yes, I'd imagine something would have to be pretty darn flinchworthy before that would happen.
Palooka, when it comes to genitals, it's very important never to flinch. You could mess something up pretty badly, particularly when you're talking about somebody else's.
Bears don't flinch, it messes their fur up for the rest of the day.
Thanks c_b. I admire your willingness to take a stand and defend it without flinching.
I reiterate my glad feelings that I'm not married to gangerh, and that my own soul mate doesn't think my genitals are his property. *nyah*
P.S. palooka, you really are a scream. :)
Palooka -- is it warm where you live? Just a guess.
Unlike male genitals which resist being stored.
Female genitals more or less store themselves, I'd say.
The difference, bilby, betweens agynary and a gynary, pray tell.
That comment will go against the grained_bear.
I store my female genitals at home.
This words seems a place where you store female genitals, probably because it looks and sounds a bit like granary.
Buffoonish is very becoming to me gangerh. I even have buffoonish eyes. Buffoonery is something I was endowed with, a gift from birth.
But, palooka, is buffoonish becoming to you lately?
Interesting analyses dontcry. I think I'm becoming to buffoonish lately.
In my therapy work, I've found having a poker-face and asking really naive questions can prove invaluable.
I see, r_t. I'll keep that in mind ;-)
I often mock-full after boring dinner parties so I can get home and eat something that's actually palatable, made by a person who has a clue as to how to feed people (that would be me!).
I mock-clueless a lot, too. You can learn quite a bit about people that way, I've discovered (and it's kinda fun!).
Not to worry, dontcry. I'm only mock-squeamish. Actually, genitals are a fascinating topic. :-D
Fortunately men aren't the only ones missing genitalia. Women are anorchous.
Which -- you have the greatest fecundity I ever have experienced. It wears me out!
Are you suggesting that I've a great fecundity?
Oh, yes, I'm smarmy and sarcastic -- but always in the name of good fun. Don't cry...
Here's my take on the feelings about agynary, for what it's worth:
c_b, you are hysterical (no pun intended) and accurate.
gangerh, you are passionate.
reesetee, you are easy-going and a little squeamish (and I love it).
palooka, you are a peace-maker (and your name makes me think of bubble gum)
whichbe, you are prolific (in general)
pro, you are missed...
Or even indignity.
Not authorized? I thought I was authorized to speak for all the males on Wordie, Prolagus. I'm sort of like a Wordie Advocate General for Male Affairs. Let's beat our chests (not our breasts) & declare our male sense of dignity.
Palooka, the fact that I'm not visiting Wordie doesn't authorize you to say we lack breasts. (See press here for a random word.)
Let's see, we lack female genitals, we lack breasts. No wonder men start so many wars! We have such an emptiness, such a sense of lack inside.
Slight correction, chained_bear. They don't partly belong to someone else, even privately partly. They wholly belong to to both of us. When you belong to each other, you don't exclude certain parts. And do two genital rights make a genital wrong?
And all because gangerh is agynary and covets someone else's genitals. Get your own, man!!
Really. This is one scary-ass page.
Well, this bear is glad she's married to someone else then. I think it would be mighty weird to have to say my genitals belong partly to someone else. They're mine, dammit. If I want to grant access, that's one thing, but they don't belong to anyone but me.
*standing up for genital rights*
Slight correction, chained_bear. They belong to both of us. And access is not always guaranteed!
And thanks for the comment - you did not disappoint.:-)
And not sure about the suit idea. Wouldn't work for me, anyway, all mine are single-breasted.
My car is agynary. Except when I'm carrying female passengers.
"Agynary People" -- coming soon to a theater near you!
Nah. It's still funny. :-)
Palooka: Yes, I know. The idea was that the word's definition implies an incompleteness. Since men do not have female genitals, I was implying that they are incomplete. It's really much less funny when I have to explain it.
Oroboros, that gives a whole new meaning to orogeny!
You mean we all have to share?
Remember, at a certain early point in the womb, everybody's got the same genitals. You know: origenitals.
Sometimes it's "okay" to be be scared, Resetee! Heh, this topic is kind of like emasculation for women...
This page is beginning to scare me.
Your first comment doesn't quite make sense c_b. The definition is "lacking female genitals". Men don't have female genitals. Hopefully we wont have to link to photos to illustrate the difference.
She will probably be most interested to find out that her genitals actually belong to you. When you say you've got some at home, do you mean you have access to some at home? Or do you mean, you know, you have ... some kind of ... suit at home, that you can put on...?
Nice try, dontcry, but it means I have my bride at home.
Does that make you transagynary?
I haven't got any on me, but I've got some at home.
good one!
Heehee.
This is true of many, many men that I know. I'm going to accuse them of being agynary from now on. *rubbing hands in glee*
Lacking female genitals. (from Phrontistery)