more searches
4 wordies list

basonym

all tags for this word (hide)
Leave a comment, citation, or usage note
about 1 month ago mollusque said:

C_B, done and done. Bilby, how about merienda?

Mia, there are millions of examples, since all species names have basonyms. Homo sapiens is its own basonym, since the name of the species hasn't changed. But I've found it hard to come up with examples where people would be familiar with both the basonym and the current name when the classification has changed. I'll let you know if I think of others.

about 1 month ago chained_bear said:

*wishes mollusque would have added hotbed of mollusk diversity to Wordie, or at least added it as a definition to the Philippines page*

about 1 month ago MiaLuthien said:

Thanks, Mollusque! The term "basonym" has now officially become a little less vague – for me, at least! Have you found any more examples?

(Wow, Philippines... *is envious*)

about 1 month ago chained_bear said:

Cool, mollusque!!
Uhh... could you close your tag when you have a chance? Your italics are showing. ;)

about 1 month ago bilby said:

Ooh! Bring me words from the Philippines, moll!

about 1 month ago mollusque said:

Hi folks, I'm in the Philippines (the hotbed of mollusk diversity!) for a conference, and have finally had time to check in on Wordie. Here's an example for basonym.

The basonym of Homo erectus is Pithecanthropus erectus; it is the name originally given to the species. Pithecanthropus was synonymized with Homo, so the name of the species changed.

about 1 month ago Shevek said:

Experimenting with other tags on a more out of the way page I tried to get < code > or < pre > to turn the page into unformatted html, but alas, in vain.

So none of you try that, ya hear?

!!!

PS - Sionnach, what about bslsk05?

about 1 month ago Shevek said:

Hahaha plethora, digital sorcery prevails! I'm also flattered to be the inspiration for a Sailor Moon attack, though I'm trying to figure out where anime panty shots fit in with html and basonyms (see, I used it!).

Mia, would you like to buy a vowel?

about 1 month ago sionnach said:

Couldn't basonym also mean "name given to a basilisk", or are all basilisks called Basil?

See, for example, the award-winning* children's book "Basil the basilisk grows an herb-garden", brought to you by the publishers of "Ethel the aardvark goes quantity surveying", and "Terry the termite eats crumpets with marmite".

* unlike its less successful sibling "Basil the basilisk loves casu marzu and ludefisk".

about 1 month ago plethora said:

Ok, we're still not on the first Google page, but basonym minifying htmlotage is third.

about 1 month ago dontcry said:

Yes, scrolling down and down and down can be irritating! ;-)

about 1 month ago MiaLuthien said:

For those who don't want to scroll down (and down, and down...), a basonym is "the original, validly published name of a taxon" (says Answers.com). While a taxon is "a taxonomic category or group, such as a phylum, order, family, genus, or species" (again, Answers.com).

But you should really go pester Mollusque, our resident expert on this subject.

about 1 month ago bilby said:

Hasten Jasonym
Bring the basonym!

about 1 month ago bilby said:

I hear Mia, and I obey.

about 1 month ago MiaLuthien said:

Hey, we're looking at you, Shevek and Bilby! Srsly.

about 1 month ago dontcry said:

Basonym: usage; "Hey, close that tag behind yourself, were you born in a basonym?!"

about 1 month ago MiaLuthien said:

OK, can we fix everything now? Because we are slowly creeping towards ridiculous. Someone had better start posting some proper usages of basonym, fast.

about 1 month ago bilby said:

Ah. I might be clued in now. I think.

about 1 month ago MiaLuthien said:

He didn't do anything extraordinary, he just didn't close the tag behind himself.

about 1 month ago bilby said:

Ok, I get that. But Mia, those instructions related to how we format our own comments. What Shevek did was to influence how other people's comments are displayed for everybody.

about 1 month ago bilby said:

basonym

about 1 month ago MiaLuthien said:

Then you've fixed my browser, because now everything's back to rights! :)

ETA – I suggest putting it in square brackets, Bilby.

And it's not ridiculous, Sionnach! Yet.

about 1 month ago VanishedOne said:

I only managed to view the rest of my own comment as red, so if you saw everything red it may be down to different browsers' handling unclosed tags differently.

about 1 month ago dontcry said:

basonym

about 1 month ago MiaLuthien said:

It's not some arcane, closely guarded knowledge, Pterodactyl :) It's easy, like this: (i)yourtexthere(/i) for italic, (b)yourtexthere(/b) for bold, and (small)yourtexthere(/small) for small (you can also substitute 'small' with 'big'). Only, you should replace ( and ) with < and > signs, respectively.

Edited: You, VanishedOne, almost gave me a heart attack. I thought that I did this! You so did turn everything red. Close the tag, pretty please?

about 1 month ago VanishedOne said:

Just look at the page source.

Wordie doesn't automatically add closing tags.

Edit: hmm, it seems I can't turn the entire page red though.

Edit2: I've removed the <small> tags from my own comment because they were reducing the lowest comments to 4x smallness, and squinting isn't nice.

about 1 month ago pterodactyl said:

I, too, would like to learn the HTML resizing trick, and I, too, will give Shevek puppy dog eyes until he/she gives in and teaches it to us.

Please?

*earnest, pleading stare*

about 1 month ago bilby said:

Did somebody say basonym?

about 1 month ago plethora said:

I think the reason our googlipresence has dropped is that we don't have the actual word basonym mentioned enough per comment to make up for all the other stuff. So everyone just needs to add basonym into their comments.

Shevek! Teach me your html tricks! Please? *puppy dog eyes*

And, sionnach, I'm not sure I get the meaning, either.

about 1 month ago MiaLuthien said:

It works wonderfully, John. If I want to, say, make others feel small and *insignificant*, then it's the right step in that direction. It's funny, though :)

ETA – basonym!

about 1 month ago John said:

love the minifying htmlotage.

about 1 month ago sionnach said:

Despite the extensive commentary, I'm still a bit unclear on what this word means. An example, or a usage example, would be helpful.

signed

slo in San Francisco

about 1 month ago Shevek said:

*ducks paddle swipe*

You really ought to add that word. I can't find it or any spelling variants on Google, or in my paper dictionary. Nice one.

about 1 month ago MiaLuthien said:

*is currently in a flagillitious mood*

about 1 month ago Shevek said:

*cowers*
*sneaks*



*pantses Mia!*

about 1 month ago MiaLuthien said:

Don't you go around poking fun at my brand spanking new pair of pants! My categorization might be sucky, but I'm quite proud of my pantaloons. I need them for when I'm pants at something.

And, as you can see, you didn't shrink my paddle.

about 1 month ago Shevek said:

Yes indeed, I'm quite the naughty one ;-P. Perhaps the paddle is over by your categorization pants? (I hope I didn't shrink the paddle too...)

about 1 month ago MiaLuthien said:

What the...? You did it, Shevek! And you made me think it was my fault. Aren't you naughty? Where's my spanking paddle?

about 1 month ago Shevek said: Mwahaha html sabotage!

*comment*

about 1 month ago MiaLuthien said:

Our googlipresence has dropped considerably. We're back on the tenth page, folks. Oh, how will I live? Why Google has to torment me so? :/

Edited!!

about 1 month ago yarb said:

Wait - I already commented here.

about 1 month ago yarb said:

Count me in.

about 1 month ago bilby said:

Do you think people like me would leave a comment here just for the sake of doing so?

about 1 month ago Prolagus said:

If we just go on commenting, we will easily be. As far as I know, the reason why we are often on top is the number of links that every page generates (i.e. there's a link to the basonym page on all "recent activity" pages of people who commented here, on the lists that have it, on the "past comments" pages, on every other page where the word is in brackets...)

about 1 month ago MiaLuthien said:

It looks like we've become a right authoritative source of information. A real fountain of effervescent collective wisdom, graciously sharing from our inexhaustible spring of profound knowledge.

I'm aiming for the first place! :)

about 1 month ago Prolagus said:

Wordie is currently the second page result for basonym. :-)

about 1 month ago mollusque said:

But what if the Wordie in question doesn't know the definition? Read several definitions, see if they agree, look for citations in Google Books, then come up with a definition that encompasses what you've learned. That's what lexicographers do. They define words they haven't previously seen, based on the available evidence. It doesn't mean that your definition will be complete or entirely correct, but it will be a good starting point for the next person who wonders about the word. And since Wordie ranks high in websearches for many unusual words, your definition is likely to be encountered.

about 1 month ago MiaLuthien said:

Well, I've been trying not to quote anything from Wikipedia and Wiktionary, at least.

about 1 month ago yarb said:

The trouble with definitions from Wikipedia, Wiktionary etc is that they're often to some extent wrong, and when they get corrected in the wiki, the old faulty copy will stay uncorrected here.

I don't mind copied definitions from professional dictionaries so much, but I still think they're basically redundant, and a citation is much more useful and interesting to me.

about 1 month ago MiaLuthien said:

That's why I'd rather Wordies write their own definitions – but what if the Wordie in question doesn't know the definition, but is trying to hunt it down, as I do? :) I try not to write definitions to words which already have one right next to them (in grey letters), but I find that words can be memorized better if some effort have been put into researching them. For me, Wordie is a kind of learning tool, instead of a social networking site.

about 1 month ago mollusque said:

And plain old pedantry. Also, I've been caught out often enough relying on single sources. That's why I'd rather Wordies write their own definitions (as noted under rhyparographer) than copy them.

about 1 month ago MiaLuthien said:

Then I bow before your expertise! It probably is a matter of professional pride for you to correct any blunders or inaccuracies you come across regarding the subject you're so well acquainted with.

about 1 month ago mollusque said:

Because I'm a taxonomist. A large part of my professional work is to determine the correct names for species and the identifications of specimens.

about 1 month ago MiaLuthien said:

How come you are so knowledgeable in this? :) I'm not arguing; today is the first time I've ever clapped my eyes on this word, and I just copied down the definition, so you may be right.

about 1 month ago mollusque said:

No, Wiktionary's definition is incorrect. A basonym is the original name given to a nominal species. The name might still be in use, or the species might have been moved to another genus. The term is not obsolete, but is used mostly in botany and bacteriology, seldom in zoology.

about 1 month ago MiaLuthien said:

basonym – an obsolete name for a biological species or genus which has been replaced by a new name

Register or login to leave a comment.
first listed by:
MiaLuthien (2942 words)
appears in these lists: