blog

"oh man, I'm really sorry, that last round of shots got right on top of me and I totally blogged into your philodendron."

hate the sound of this word

"For What It's Worth
I've decided to pronounce the word "weblog" as wee'- blog. Or "blog" for short." April/May 1999.

http://www.peterme.com/archives/00000205.html

To each their own, but jonjonz, but I hope you don't boycott Wordie when I start one. It needs a place to archive annoucements, and "page for brief messages, in reverse chronological order, on which one can leave comments" is too, well, wordy. Also, what do Content Management Systems (CMS's) have to do with the price of eggs? A worse linguistic crime than a useful abbreviation is the proliferation of useless tech jargon, especially when in the form of acronyms.

Aside from seanahan's valid rebuttal, I think that you've made a substantial error, jonjonz, by confusing the properties of sound and meaning. You begin your tirade "It sounds like..." (refering to the sound) but end it by talking about pride, which (you say) refers to the meaning. Be clear what you are talking about.

As an aside, "Vanity Press" would surely not be appropriate for a digital medium, no?

Shakespeare made up a ton of words, and some of them sounded pretty awkward. Saying that he wouldn't like this word is ridiculous. Whatever arguments you may have against the word, you need to separate it from a completely meaningless assertion that Shakespeare wouldn't like it.

This word is an abomination. It sounds like someone took a long, painfull, smelly, and uncomfortable dump and left the results with misplaced pride for others to revile. The use of this word marks the user as pretentious, shallow and most of all vain. "Vanity Press" is more accurate. Most people who use the word cannot explain the difference between a web page created using CMS, or hand coded. I am sure William Shakespeare would never stoop to coming within 10 feet of anything with such an abhorrent perversion of the language.